With America being designed around the needs of its women, it was ironical that a web writer should recently say:
“A group of the most highly-paid, privileged, and honor-laden women in history officially launched their screed against gender bias at Harvard yesterday. Harvard’s Task Force on Women Faculty presented its report on the university’s sexism to an adoring gathering of the school’s Standing Committee on Women. The event was drenched in irony, but few of the participants noticed.”

A lot of these mollycoddled female professors have made careers out of criticising the “sexist white male patriarchy”. But it’s that very patriarchy that pays them handsome salaries to keep them in comfort and luxury. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you!

The Radcliffe Institute recently sponsored the journalist Susan Faludi, to speak on “9/11 Gender Shock: How 9/11 Got Enlisted in the Latest Backlash Against Feminism.” After 9/11 it was obvious to all that, when the chips are down, it’s men who have to sort things out. To be fair to ordinary American women, they realised that it was men and only men who faced danger to protect the public and to restore normality. They lined up in New York to cheer them as they passed by, and kept them supplied with food and drink. They knew the worth of men and were prepared to show it. But not their learned sisters at Havard it seems.

Every one of the “firefighters” who went up into those blazing buildings were fireMEN. Not a single woman amongst them despite the fact that the New York fire service has women in its ranks.

I came across one web site after 9/11 that praised all the men and women who went up the twin towers to rescue people and fight the fires. I wrote to the webmaster to ask for the names of the women who went up and, quite naturally, I got no reply. There were no women.

Quite naturally, this came as a severe body blow to the feminists whose mantra “anything men can do we can do” is repeated ad nauseam.

Another matter that annoyed these 'so sensitive" female professors at Havard was a comment by the President, Lawrence Summers. He had the audacity to suggest that the lack of proportional representation of women in the sciences may not be the result of discrimination alone. The feminazi at Havard should have been relieved that he spoke so moderately. It has nothing whatsoever to do with discrimination. Women on the whole are just not interested in the sciences and so naturally do not heed the diktats of the feminist “sisters” that more of them should study science.

The sisterhood at Havard are hoping to reinforce their ranks by introducing a tyrannical quota enforcer to get more women professors appointed no matter how inneffective they might be in their jobs. Many of our schools are suffering from the presence of a majority of female teachers who have scant ability to teach boys. Do we want this disease to spread to universities also?